Adding striking to your PT business without winging it

By Martijn de Jong, founder of Tatsujin

Striking sells. That part is not in doubt, and it is why so many trainers add it. What decides whether it lasts is not whether clients want it, but whether what you deliver is recognisably a system or recognisably improvised.

What is a client actually buying when they ask for striking?

Not fitness. They can get tired anywhere, and most of them already know that. What a client is buying is the experience of being coached at something: a skill with a right and a wrong, where somebody who knows the difference is watching them and telling them which one they just did. That is also why striking retains clients so well when it is taught properly and burns out so quickly when it is not. A client who is learning can feel that they are learning, and they will book again to keep the feeling. A client who is handed a different tiring thing every week can feel that too, even though they will never say it in those words. What they say instead is that they would like to take a break for a while, and that break does not end. The difference between the two is not your energy or your enthusiasm. It is whether there was a curriculum underneath the hour.

Why improvised striking gets priced like a warm-up

Here is the uncomfortable maths of it. Anybody can put gloves on a client and hold pads badly for part of a session. Because anybody can, it is worth what anybody's time is worth. The moment it is a curriculum with a level, an order and a next step, it is not the same product any more, and it is not priced against the same alternatives. That is the whole difference between adding an activity and adding a specialisation, and it shows up in what you can charge, what you get referred for, and whether a gym puts you in front of its members as the person who does this.

None of that comes from knowing more techniques than the trainer next to you. It comes from having something to show that looks like a programme rather than a mood.

The three things to have in place first

A structure you can repeat. Not a favourite session, a shape: what the warm-up is for, why pad work is the bulk of it, where conditioning sits. Repeatable is what makes progression possible, because you cannot progress something whose shape changes every week.

Pad holding you can stand behind. This is the one trainers skip and the one that ends the experiment. It is a real skill, and it is the one that keeps both of you healthy. There is a whole guide on it.

An order to teach in. Which combination comes first, what it builds into, when a client is ready for kicks. Without it every session starts from a blank page and you will fall back on the same handful of things you like.

How to introduce it to clients you already have

Do not rebrand yourself as a kickboxing coach on Monday. Put striking into part of the sessions of the clients who would obviously enjoy it, and coach it as a skill from the first minute: name the combination, tell them what it is for, tell them what they will be able to do in a few weeks that they cannot do today.

Then let them tell the other clients. Striking spreads inside a client base faster than anything else in a gym, because it is the one thing a client goes home and demonstrates in their kitchen.

What about certification

Worth being precise here, because the words get used loosely. A coaching system gives you the curriculum, the structure and the material to work from. A certification is a course you attend in person, where somebody watches you hold, corrects you, and puts their name to the fact that you can do it. They are different things, and one does not substitute for the other.

For most trainers the sensible order is the system first, because it is what changes your sessions next week, and the in-person certification when the striking part of your business is real enough to justify the trip. That order is also the honest one: you will get far more out of a course in person once you have been coaching from a structure for a while.

What good looks like after a few months

You are not deciding what to do on the way to the session. Your clients know the names of the combinations they work on. Somebody has asked whether you also do this for their partner. And you are no longer wondering whether the striking sessions are as good as the strength ones, because they are built the same way.

If you want to see what a session built from a real curriculum looks like, start with the structure guide, or see what the full system costs in your country.

Read next